The demographics of a blog readership.

With metrics in science publishing controversial to say the least, I pondered whether to write about the impact/influence a science-based blog might have (never mind whether it constitutes any measure of esteem). These are all terms that feature large when an (academic) organisation undertakes a survey of its researchers’ effectiveness. WordPress (the organisation that provides the software used for this blog) recently enhanced the stats it offers for its users, and one of these caught my eye.


The above represents the demographics for the readership of this blog over the last ten months. In no particular order, I noted the following aspects:

  1. The total number of countries listed was 144.
  2. The country coming third was India.
  3. China came 51st. I noted this since it was recently announced in the news that China leads the world by a significant margin in patents granted for e.g. graphene research, with South Korea third. It would also be fair to say that China also heads the field for the number of chemists with a Ph.D. degree.
  4. There are some interesting gaps in the world map, from where not a single hit was recorded. I really must crack Greenland! 
  5. WordPress does not provide a demographic breakdown for individual posts, which would be an interesting one to see.

One does not get such statistics from conventional scientific publishers, where the number of citations of an article is considered far more important than the demographics of its readership. However, I cannot help but note that access to journals is largely controlled by paid-for subscriptions (the GOLD-OA model has yet to make a big impact in chemistry I fear), whereas blogs in contrast are almost entirely open (although access to them may be restricted in some countries). 

‡  I once listened to a talk by a manager whose mantra was the three e’s:  effective, efficient and economic.  

Tags: , ,

3 Responses to “
The demographics of a blog readership.

  1. It is nice to see that Africa is not one blank area, and that thus Science 2.0 engagement is growing throught the continent!

  2. Henry Rzepa says:

    Absolutely. However, there is some regret that whenever I cite a “conventional” publication in the blog, it is increasingly the case that many readers may not have access rights to the journal. Even where I work, I find that instant access to older issues of journals is not automatic, and I have to apply for an inter-library-loan to get them. These often arrive as photocopied sheets of paper up to a week later. Roll on when science publishing becomes properly open.

  3. T says:

    Views per capita:

    United Kingdom
    United States
    Republic of Korea
    Russian Federation

Leave a Reply