Sometimes you come across a reaction which is so simple in concept that you wonder why it took so long to be accomplished in practice. In this case, replacing toxic ozone O3 as used to fragment an alkene into two carbonyl compounds (“ozonolysis”) by a relatively non-toxic simple nitro-group based reagent, ArNO2 in which the central atom of ozone is substituted by an N-aryl group. As reported by Derek Lowe, two groups have published[1], [2] details of such a reaction (Ar = 4-cyano or 3-CF3,5-NO2). But there are (at least) two tricks; the first is to use photo-excitation using purple LEDs (390nm light) to activate the nitro group. The second is to establish the best aryl substituents to use for achieving maximum yields of the carbonyl compounds and the best conditions for achieving the cyclo-reversion reaction, shown below as TS1. That step requires heating the cyclo-adduct up to ~80° in (aqueous) acetonitrile for anywhere between 1-48 hours. Here I take a computational look at that last step, the premise being that if such a model is available for this mechanism, it could in principle be used to optimise the conditions for the process.
The proposed mechanism for the workup in aqueous acetonitrile[2] is shown below, involving TS1 (a thermal pericyclic cycloreversion reaction), TS2 and TS3 involving intervention of either two or three water molecules to produce the carbonyl compounds and an aryl hydroxylamine (which might of itself be a valuable product). It was also mooted[2] that an alternative mechanism might involve extrusion of an aryl nitrene instead of a cycloreversion (shown as TS4). The calculations use the following method: (U)ωB97XD/Def2-TZVPP/SCRF=acetonitrile. The FAIR data DOI for them is 10.14469/hpc/11269.
Since the workup occurs at up to ~80° in aqueous acetonitrile,[2] the activation free energy that would allow this must be <~25 kcal/mol.
Model | ΔG‡ TS1 | ΔG‡ TS2 | ΔG‡ TS3 |
---|---|---|---|
Reactants | 0 | ||
Closed shell ionic | 30.0 | – | |
“TS4” | 73.9 | – | |
+biradical | 27.5 | – | |
+biradical + 2H2O | 24.5 | 13.7 | 9.2 |
+biradical + 3H2O | 23.2 | 12.6 | -1.5 |
Products + 3H2O | -20.4 |
The results here could be used for e.g. computational exploration of how variation in the aromatic group might affect the barrier for cycloreversion.‡ Ideally, a version of this reaction which might operate at much lower temperatures would enhance this alternative to using ozone.
‡ The ΔG‡value for p-CN.3H2O is lower (22.1 kcal/mol vs 23.3 kcal/mol) suggesting it proceeds rather more quickly than the m-CF3,NO2 version. This post has DOI: 10.14469/hpc/11319
In an earlier post, I discussed a phenomenon known as the "anomeric effect" exhibited by…
In the mid to late 1990s as the Web developed, it was becoming more obvious…
I have written a few times about the so-called "anomeric effect", which relates to stereoelectronic…
The recent release of the DataCite Data Citation corpus, which has the stated aim of…
Following on from my template exploration of the Wilkinson hydrogenation catalyst, I now repeat this…
In the late 1980s, as I recollected here the equipment needed for real time molecular…