In this earlier post, I described how the stereochemistry of π2+π2 cycloadditions occurs suprafacially if induced by light, and how one antarafacial component appears if the reaction is induced by heat alone. I also noted how Woodward and Hoffmann (WH) explained that violations to their rules were avoided by mandating a change in mechanism requiring stepwise pathways with intermediates along the route. Here I illustrate how the stereochemistry of a thermal π2+π2 cycloaddition can indeed avoid an antarafacial component by performing appropriate gymnastic contortions instead of a mechanistic change (a WH violation certainly in the letter of their law, if not their spirit).
The IRC for the reaction (R=CH=S) shows the two molecules moving towards each other in a trapezoidal motion, with the axes of the C=C bonds parallel and the faces clearly suprafacial. At IRC ~-4, the nature of motion changes into a slide of one C=C axis along the other, converting the trapezoidal geometry into a square. By doing so, a full frontal “violation” is changed into a more subtle sideways insertion.
This trapezoidal motif for a thermal reaction does require the two R groups to have electron withdrawing nature, but it is noteworthy that the same motif was found for the photochemically induced π2+π2 cycloaddition. That both the thermal AND the photochemical pathways have essentially the same geometry is indeed a violation of WH!In the mid to late 1990s as the Web developed, it was becoming more obvious…
I have written a few times about the so-called "anomeric effect", which relates to stereoelectronic…
The recent release of the DataCite Data Citation corpus, which has the stated aim of…
Following on from my template exploration of the Wilkinson hydrogenation catalyst, I now repeat this…
In the late 1980s, as I recollected here the equipment needed for real time molecular…
On 24th January 1984, the Macintosh computer was released, as all the media are informing…
View Comments