I'm very willing to do this; capitalization has been an issue for me
throughout. Whatever we do, I want it to be _consistent_.
>- The names themselves, which are currently taken from the XML spec
>in hopes of some recognition, but could also be simplified
>(ElementDecl -> Element, AttDef -> Attribute) as some members
>of this list have suggested.
I can go either way on this one. I thought sticking to the spec might
encourage consistency, but I don't think the labels in the spec are in
widespread usage. Element instead of ElementDecl is fine with me.
>- Capitalization -- Mixed, under_score_happy, ALLCAPS, nocaps,
>pSYcHOTic, etc.
As anyone who's read XML:A Primer knows, I'm an ALLCAPS person, but the
current system is mostly fine for me. (I got a bit lost when ALLCAPS turned to
Mixed in things like IDREF.)
>If people are interested, I would be happy to put together a
>ballot and run a vote.
Sounds good. That way I can focus on namespaces. :-@
Simon St.Laurent
Dynamic HTML: A Primer / XML: A Primer / Cookies