<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Text-books and the bromination of ethene.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ch.imperial.ac.uk/rzepa/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=7964" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ch.imperial.ac.uk/rzepa/blog/?p=7964</link>
	<description>Chemistry with a twist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:37:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry Rzepa</title>
		<link>http://www.ch.imperial.ac.uk/rzepa/blog/?p=7964&#038;cpage=1#comment-12074</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Rzepa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 06:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ch.imperial.ac.uk/rzepa/blog/?p=7964#comment-12074</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have had an email asking about the (free energy, &#916;G&lt;sub&gt;298&lt;/sub&gt;) barriers I computed for the bromination of ethene.

Recollect that the reactants are non polar, whereas TS1 has a dipole moment of 18.7D. Thus the barrier should be expected to be very sensitive to the solvent. In dichloromethane, the solvent I used in the above simulation, the value of &#916;G starting from the &lt;a href=&quot;http://hdl.handle.net/10042/20778&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;complex formed from 2Br&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;  and ethene&lt;/a&gt; (see discussion of those species at this review, DOI: &lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.200390097&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;10.1002/chem.200390097&lt;/a&gt;) is 11.5 kcal/mol. Separating these three components to infinite distance raises this to 20.0 kcal/mol due to greater loss of entropy. These values still essentially correspond to a reasonably rapid room temperature reaction. 
&lt;img width=&quot;300&quot; src=&quot;http://www.ch.imperial.ac.uk/rzepa/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Br4+ethene.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Complex formed between bromine and ethene&quot; /&gt; 
But change the solvent to tetrachloromethane (which is very non-polar), the free energy values rise to 22.5 and  30.8 kcal/mol respectively, which now corresponds to a slow reaction. The rate of reaction is thus predicted to be very sensitive to solvent.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have had an email asking about the (free energy, &Delta;G<sub>298</sub>) barriers I computed for the bromination of ethene.</p>
<p>Recollect that the reactants are non polar, whereas TS1 has a dipole moment of 18.7D. Thus the barrier should be expected to be very sensitive to the solvent. In dichloromethane, the solvent I used in the above simulation, the value of &Delta;G starting from the <a href="http://hdl.handle.net/10042/20778" rel="nofollow">complex formed from 2Br<sub>2</sub>  and ethene</a><img src="http://www.ch.imperial.ac.uk/rzepa/blog/wp-content/plugins/zlinks/imgs/mini_rdf.gif" border="0" style="cursor: pointer; padding:0px 0px 0px 1px; margin:0px;" onmouseover="assignPopup(this, 'http://hdl.handle.net/10042/20778', 'http://www.ch.imperial.ac.uk/rzepa/blog/wp-content/plugins/zlinks/');" alt="" /> (see discussion of those species at this review, DOI: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.200390097" rel="nofollow">10.1002/chem.200390097</a><img src="http://www.ch.imperial.ac.uk/rzepa/blog/wp-content/plugins/zlinks/imgs/mini_rdf.gif" border="0" style="cursor: pointer; padding:0px 0px 0px 1px; margin:0px;" onmouseover="assignPopup(this, 'http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.200390097', 'http://www.ch.imperial.ac.uk/rzepa/blog/wp-content/plugins/zlinks/');" alt="" />) is 11.5 kcal/mol. Separating these three components to infinite distance raises this to 20.0 kcal/mol due to greater loss of entropy. These values still essentially correspond to a reasonably rapid room temperature reaction.<br />
<img width="300" src="http://www.ch.imperial.ac.uk/rzepa/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Br4+ethene.jpg" alt="Complex formed between bromine and ethene" /><br />
But change the solvent to tetrachloromethane (which is very non-polar), the free energy values rise to 22.5 and  30.8 kcal/mol respectively, which now corresponds to a slow reaction. The rate of reaction is thus predicted to be very sensitive to solvent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How is the bromination of alkenes best represented? &#171; Henry Rzepa</title>
		<link>http://www.ch.imperial.ac.uk/rzepa/blog/?p=7964&#038;cpage=1#comment-11738</link>
		<dc:creator>How is the bromination of alkenes best represented? &#171; Henry Rzepa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2012 21:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ch.imperial.ac.uk/rzepa/blog/?p=7964#comment-11738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Henry Rzepa Chemistry with a twist      &#171; Text-books and the bromination of ethene. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Henry Rzepa Chemistry with a twist      &laquo; Text-books and the bromination of ethene. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

 Served from: www.ch.imperial.ac.uk @ 2013-05-23 17:58:30 by W3 Total Cache -->